🔗 Share this article

The number of reserved positions for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by more than half, following a controversial legislative amendment that forced local governments to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to establish a Indigenous seat by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently spent years generating local support and urging their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the former administration permitted local councils to set up a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated local authorities that had created a ward under Labour’s rules to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Of 42 councils participating in the referendum, 17 decided to retain their seats, and 25 to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results provided “a vital step in reinstating community self-determination.”

Critics however have criticised the government’s law change as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it aims to end “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Indigenous people and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to hit their stride.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

This year’s local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens participating, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Comparative Treatment

Councils are able to establish different wards – such as countryside seats – without initially mandating a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the government was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 regions that voted to retain their seats.